Brant is the On-One (and Planet-X and Titus) designer, and gets his knickers in a twist quite a bit about things that don't bother other people.
This week (as this is going to be a regular slot) he has a bit of a scribble about "frame compliance" and why it's NOT the rear triangle of a bike that makes the ride comfortable (or not).
|If we consider a frame to be loaded at the points as shown, let’s look at what happens to the various tubes.|
|This is what people who think rear triangle compliance has an effect on frames happens. I think this is bollocks.|
|This is what happens. The front fork tries to rip the front of the bike off, and splays the top tube and downtube under simple bending, resulting in the wheels spreading apart under load. This is what happens.|
The rear stays do splay a little if left unsupported. But they bow outwards. There is FEA done to show this. They don’t bend the other way.
S bend stays make people think they are springy as they look a bit like a spring, but a spring is actually a coiled up torsion bar. It’s not curved like that for compliance as such.
First seen at shedfire’s dumping ground
2 April 2012